|
Re: Does *anyone* use MVC?: msg#00838lang.smalltalk.squeak.general
Scott Wallace <scott.wallace@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> asked... >It seems to me that no Squeaker could plausibly have been doing any real work >in MVC in any 3.2 or 3.3a since this bug arrived more than eight months ago, >because the mere raising of a single debugger would have put his environment >into a state no reasonable person could tolerate. And he would therefore have >screamed and we would have heard. > >Consequently, I'm not too surprised that there has not been a single response >posted to this thread, other than Boris's original bug report and my reply. > >But is it really true that there are actually *no* MVC practitioners using >either Squeak 3.2 or 3.3a , no one at all, except Boris? I believe it may be the case that MVC users also tend to use stable releases, and therefore many may still be using 2.8. So if you are or might be an MVC user, in addition to answering Scott, please say... What release do you use now? Do you plan to move to 3.2 in the near future? Thanks - Dan
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: new some good apps for demo, Tim Rowledge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OT] Common Language Infrastructures, David Farber |
| Previous by Thread: | Does *anyone* use MVC? (was: Re: [BUG?] weird behaviour of MVC in Squeak 3.2), Scott Wallace |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Does *anyone* use MVC?, Tim Rowledge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |