|
Re: Progrmaming in Bytecode?: msg#00810lang.smalltalk.squeak.general
At Wednesday, 31 July 2002, you wrote: >I know this may sound sadistic, but how could I go about programming in >Smalltalk bytecode, directly? I've seen assemblers for Java, that do the >same job as assemblers for native CPUs. I imagine such a tool doesn't >exist for SMalltalk at this time, but perhaps it wouldn't be hard to put >one together in my quest to play with bytecode. One of the projects I did a while ago was writing PIC/Smalltalk, which basically is a Slang-style translater that translates Smalltalk source code into PIC assembler. PIC chips are tiny 8-bit RISC embedded micro-controllers (www.microchip.com), with miniscule amounts of memory (program memory measured in single-digit kilobytes and RAM between 50 and 500 bytes). If you want to work at a low level with Smalltalk, doing stuff like that is fun and useful as well. And of course it works in Squeak, although its been a while since I did anything with it. http://www.huv.com/smalltalk for more details... Later, Jon -------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Hylands Jon@xxxxxxx http://www.huv.com/jon Project: Micro Seeker (Micro Autonomous Underwater Vehicle) http://www.huv.com
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Progrmaming in Bytecode?, Dan Ingalls |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Progrmaming in Bytecode?, Michael Rueger |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Progrmaming in Bytecode?, Tim Rowledge |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Progrmaming in Bytecode?, Michael Rueger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |