|
Re: Screenshot for publicity: msg#00778lang.smalltalk.squeak.general
I think it's too much. It's trying to capture too many groups who aren't very much alike at all. Why not split it out into categories? Try: Squeak for kids Squeak for programmers (could be split out into gaming programmers, server/client programmers, etc.) Squeak for multimedia Squeak for ??? The idea of categories makes me feel that Squeak can meet my needs as XXXX. We know that Squeak in all its forms is still Squeak. But that may be too much for a newbie to wrap his/her mind around. =jason On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 17:29, Diego Gomez Deck wrote: > Hi guys, > > I created a screenshot to use for publicity for 3.2 release. > > See it at http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/683 and > http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/uploads/683/squeak32.jpeg > > Comments? > > Diego Gomez Deck > > >
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [BUG?] weird behaviour of MVC in Squeak 3.2, Scott Wallace |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Cannot install Squeak v. 3.2-4, Lex Spoon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Screenshot for publicity, Felix Franz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Screenshot for publicity, Doug Way |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |