Re: New to SmallTalk and Squeak

Welcome, I am 14, and I just started with Smalltalk and Squeak, and I personally feel that it is easier to use and understand, once you get a basic understanding of how everything works.  I have only really written software in Java, and I have played around with C++ a bit, but Smalltalk is my favorite language at the moment, and probably will be for quite some time!

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Nathan Lane <nathamberlane@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Cool, thanks for the correction. I realized right away it was different.  Thanks for explaining.

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Bert Freudenberg <bert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 28.03.2008, at 17:28, Nathan Lane wrote:
> There was one I forgot to mention, which claims to use a similar
> production paradigm to SmallTalk - that is Ruby.  I've been
> programming in Ruby for over a year now, which I know isn't the
> same, already, but it too is completely Object Oriented and Object
> Based.

The object semantics are indeed similar. However, in Squeak you're
interacting with live objects directly, rather than having them
recreated from dead code all the time. That's a huge difference once
you make the mind shift.

And, btw, it's "Smalltalk" with a lowercase t.

- Bert -

_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners

--
Nathan Lane
Home, http://www.nathandelane.com
Mirror, http://nathandelane.awardspace.com

_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners

-- 
David Zmick
/dz0004455\
http://dz0004455.googlepages.com
http://dz0004455.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners