|
RE: Design best practice : put state-independent methods onclass side?: msg#00162lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners
> I'm guessing you like that the class methods can be invoked > easily from the class name. What you want is a well known object. Like a class? > I wouldn't use a class object just to create a well known > object. I'd probably start with a Singleton and work from there. Like a class? Classes are singletons, what do you have against using them as such? Ramon Leon http://onsmalltalk.com
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Design best practice : put state-independent methods on class side?, David Mitchell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Design best practice : put state-independent methods onclass side?, David Mitchell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Design best practice : put state-independent methods on class side?, David Mitchell |
| Next by Thread: | Design best practice : put state-independent methods onclass side?, David Mitchell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |