|
Re: Re: is 0.1 a Float or a ScaledDecimal ?: msg#00158lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners
> > Waaah, belief and plausibility as sum over numbers; shudder; > political-systems-failure through machine calculations; market-meltdown > through machine calculations; poverty-for-everyone through machine > calculations :( Anyways, have you compared to Pei Wang's NARS (or perhaps > his "The limitation of Bayesianism"), that would be interesting [OT]. > Tried to convince him that fractions are sufficient for him but he liked > floats more (his early J* prototype had no system support for fractions > ...). > wooww interesting but late for me :( > Do you have calculations of your model's epsilon on which you base your > "imprecise", "uncertain", etc ? Or do you at present (for the prototype) > just stab in the dark. > I guess I just stab in the dark... I have to leave, I'll read a bit and tell you later... Thanks a lot ;) Cédrick _______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: is 0.1 a Float or a ScaledDecimal ?, Klaus D. Witzel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ordinary #hash and Dictionary [was: Recap: How to empty a collection], nicolas cellier |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: is 0.1 a Float or a ScaledDecimal ?, Klaus D. Witzel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: is 0.1 a Float or a ScaledDecimal ?, johnps11 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |