Re: block in recursion, Any cure for that kind of situation?

I figured it out - I meant monticello + squeaksource.

Having loaded newcompiler, ast, blockchecker, and newcompilerloader, it doesn't seem to have made a difference.

On Jan 23, 2008 12:00 AM, Marcin Tustin < mm3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

So am I right in thinking that if I get newCompiler, blocks will work as I would expect them to (like lambdas)?

If so, how do I get the most recent version? I remember there being something that has superceded squeakmap, but I can't seem to find it.

On Jan 22, 2008 11:42 PM, Ben Goetter <goetter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>This is a maintenance nightmare waiting to happen.  Use a proper method call,

Squeak Smalltalk blocks are just similar enough to Scheme lambdas that I still fall into this trap, too.

(letrec ((carre (lambda (s1 s2 s3 s4 n)
                (if (> n 0)
                 (carre (segment s1 s2)
                        (segment s2 s3)
                        (segment s3 s4)
                        (segment s1 s4)
                        (- n 1))))))
 'oops-must-remember-this-is-Squeak-not-Scheme)

Ben

_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners

_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners