|
Re: monticello package - adding instance variables toexisting classes: msg#00088lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners
"Matthew Fulmer" <tapplek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message > On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 07:50:54PM -0600, itsme213 wrote: >> I understand how Monticello deals with me adding (in my package) some >> methods to an existing class like Object (from other package). >> >> How does it deal with me adding an instance variable? > > If you mean in a class outside you're package, it doesn't Does that mean I cannot (or am not supposed to) add inst-vars to existing classes homed in other packages? I was hoping that doing this, and adding lazy initializing accessors, would allow for an aop-style definition of some classes. Class even has a method #addInstVarName: I am curious about the reasons for this restriction. Is it because of the way Monticello relies on method category names? Thanks.
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: monticello package - adding instance variables to existing classes, Matthew Fulmer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: monticello package - adding instance variables toexisting classes, Matthew Fulmer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: monticello package - adding instance variables to existing classes, Matthew Fulmer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: monticello package - adding instance variables toexisting classes, Matthew Fulmer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |