|
Re: smalltalk analogy of a scheme expression: msg#00136lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners
The result of quoting in Scheme is the meta-level representation of the quoted expression. The equivalent of '(+ 3 4) in Smalltalk is the parse tree representing the expression 3+4 On 9/25/07, Ramon Leon <ramon.leon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In scheme, > > > > (+ 3 4) > > > > is to > > > > '(+ 3 4) > > > > As, (In smalltalk) > > > > 3 + 4 > > > > is to > > > > [3 + 4] > > > > ??? correct? bees in the bonnet? what do you say? ??? > > > > m. > > No, [3 + 4] == (lambda () (+ 3 4)) in Scheme. > > I could be wrong (I don't think I am), but I don't believe Smalltalk has any > syntactical equivalent to a quote to turn code into a data structure. > > Ramon Leon > http://onsmalltalk.com > > _______________________________________________ > Beginners mailing list > Beginners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners >
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Traits, Bert Freudenberg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: Quinto game in SBE, Scott Wallace |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: smalltalk analogy of a scheme expression, Ramon Leon |
| Next by Thread: | TextAttributes in OBDefinitions, Robert Krahn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |