|
Re: The old inisqueak problem on Linux: msg#00161lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners
Hi Michael,. > > Which instructions are you following? The instructions which follow after the successive run of the INSTALL-script. The instructions about inisqueak are written on the manpage of squeak and inisqueak as well. BTW I do not have the problem to get Squeak run by myself. I know what to do. But it is entirely different to the instructions given. And I think about those who want to get acquainted to Squeak for the first time. > > Which package are you installing? The package from www.squeak.org. > Are you installing the package that > comes with your Linux distribution? Are there already such distributions? I wonder why SuSE does not have integrated Squeak yet. > I shall investigate this issue further and raise a bug report if there > are problems. As you said, there is a bug report already done in March this year. I did several bug reports last year. But I cannot see any changes. Regards Heiko -- Heiko Schroeder Praha, Ceska Republica http://home.foni.net/~heikos http://www.od.shuttle.de/evb-1
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Block other processes?, Ralph Johnson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: The old inisqueak problem on Linux, johnps11 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: The old inisqueak problem on Linux, Michael van der Gulik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: The old inisqueak problem on Linux, johnps11 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |