|
Re: Block other processes?: msg#00160lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners
> I guess I should have said "a Morph's step processes". Yes, that makes a difference! In general, a Morph's step method runs to completion. However, if you had a higher-priority process running in the background, it would be possible for it to be interrupted. That probably won't happen unless you write the background process. If you do, you'll have to worry about the fact that most Smalltalk classes are not thread safe. -Ralph
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Fwd: Prompter Class, phiroc |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: The old inisqueak problem on Linux, Heiko Schroeder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Block other processes?, John Almberg |
| Next by Thread: | The old inisqueak problem on Linux, Heiko Schroeder |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |