|
Re: Block other processes?: msg#00153lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners
Hi Ralph, Thanks for your response. I guess I should have said "a Morph's step processes". Basically, what I'm doing is building a set of indicators that are measuring activity on a remote server. Each indicator is a Morph that both does the measurement and displays the results. The measurement is done in the Morph's step method. So I should have said something like "Is a Morph's step method ever interrupted, or does it run to completion?" However, thanks for the pointer to the Process and Semaphore code. I'm sure I won't be changing anything in there, but it will help to understand how Squeak is working. Thanks! -- John
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: XML Post, Giovanni Corriga |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Tutorial status, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Block other processes?, Ralph Johnson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Block other processes?, Ralph Johnson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |