|
Re-2: Defining a class at runtime: msg#00105lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners
I think you mean building a
class from within an instance of a class. The whole environment is the runtime
but things we see happen as instances of some classes like eg. SystemWindows you
may feel as the "runtime".
Just my 2 cents
Cheers,
Frank
>On 7/20/07, Bert
Freudenberg <bert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>On Jul 20, 2007, at
11:31 , Marcin Tustin wrote:
>>
>> >> On 7/20/07, Bert Freudenberg <bert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: On Jul >> 20, 2007, at 8:52 , Louis Moon wrote: >> ...and yes, of
course, there is a runtime.
>Well, you could say
there is only runtime. Which makes the term
>useless, as it implies some sort of opposite. >Then how would you refer to runtime? In any case, we can oppose it to code-definition time. Nothing exciting may >happen then, but it's worth being able to talk about it. Edelstahlwerke Schmees GmbH
Geschäftsleitung Clemens Schmees Sitz D-01796 Pirna Handelsregister Dresden HRB 54 E-Mail: es.la@xxxxxxxxxxx WEB: www.schmees.com
Diese
E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn
Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten
haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail.
Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht
gestattet. Beginners mailing list Beginners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Defining a class at runtime, Bert Freudenberg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Defining a class at runtime, Marcin Tustin |
| Previous by Thread: | Defining a class at runtime, Louis Moon |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re-2: Defining a class at runtime, Marcin Tustin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |