logo       

Re: Defining a class at runtime: msg#00103

lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners

Subject: Re: Defining a class at runtime



On 7/20/07, Bert Freudenberg <bert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 20, 2007, at 11:31 , Marcin Tustin wrote:

>
>
> On 7/20/07, Bert Freudenberg <bert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: On Jul
> 20, 2007, at 8:52 , Louis Moon wrote:

> ...and yes, of course, there is a runtime.

Well, you could say there is only runtime. Which makes the term
useless, as it implies some sort of opposite.

Then how would you refer to runtime? In any case, we can oppose it to code-definition time. Nothing exciting may happen then, but it's worth being able to talk about it.
_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise