|
Re: Better editor components?: msg#00060lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners
> I've been playing around with SeaSide tutorials, using the class browser > and > the workspace - is this the right way to do things? The text editing there > is pretty sucky for a man used to xemacs, so I ask: is there a better > "application" for editing code, or can I get hold of a better generic > editor > component that can be dropped in to replace the one the browser and > workspace are using? The editors within the Squeak environment are a lot more advanced than any in a web browser's text editing form... if you have access to the image that hosts your Seaside setup, you might be better served adding and editing methods in the Squeak environment itself. http://www.mucow.com/squeak-qref.html#UsingBindings They are very much the same but a lot more advanced. (Of course, that means getting familiar with the Squeak environment, if you are not already. That can be a beast in itself, but it's such a rewarding battle...) Cheers, Tim
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: web based game development in squeak, Blake |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Fishing for a Masters Thesis Topic, Robert Stehwien |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Better editor components?, Enno Schwass |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Better editor components?, Stuart Herring |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |