On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:12:15 -0800, Edgar J. De Cleene
<edgardec2001@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
El 3/30/07 2:58 PM, "Ralph Johnson" <johnson@xxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
Setting accessor methods are a time-honored exception.
Could expand ?
Are you saying what if we have foo should have setfoo: and getfoo: ?
Is that is the case is a simple implementation...
I believe he's saying: By the logic of using "set" to indicate setting a
value, you should have "setFoo:" but when its an accessor method, using
just "foo:" is the time-honored exception.
| 