Re: BlockClosure>>fork problem

On Feb 28, 2007, at 20:56 , stephane ducasse wrote:

> On 20 févr. 07, at 21:55, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
> > On Feb 20, 2007, at 21:28 , George Herolyants wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for this answer, Ron. But actually I'm not confused with  
> > > order in wich '1' and '2' presents in result line. I can't  
> > > understand why in some cases this code results ten '1' and ten  
> > > '2' and in some cases it results ten '2' and only nine '1'?
> >
> > Oh, that's indeed a bug. Transcript is unreliable when called from  
> > different processes. The mutex inside the Transcript only protects  
> > the change reporting but not the actual stream writing.
>
> Bert what do you mean by change reporting?

It is only used in

        TranscriptStream>>endEntry

to protect

        self changed: #appendEntry.

- Bert -