Re: Changesets, Monticello and SqueakMap

Norbert,

There is a document I created with the intend to explain Monticello, SqueakMap 
and SqueakSource, mostly to myself :) . It is not finished by far, so I hope 
it will not mislead you (only the first third is what I would consider 
finished, up to about step 1.4 and also skip the "Project Terms and 
Comparison of Tools" wich is still wrong)

http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5878

Milan

On 2007 January 29 14:03, Norbert Hartl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at the moment I try to figure out how the three configuration
> management approaches fit together. After switching to Monticello
> I found my life a lot easier :) Monticello is of great help!
>
> Then I noticed that changesets are named after the Monticello
> package that was last imported. I'm not quite sure if changesets
> have any benefit if someone is using monticello.
>
> Then there is squeakmap. Squeakmap seems to be the official
> release server. Is squeakmap tied to a special format? Can
> squeakmap use monticello  packages as well? I'm asking because I
> had problems to find any version information on squeakmap (beside
> the squeakmap version).
>
> While reading the squeak lists it appeared to me that a lot of
> you are developing with monticello and releasing on squeakmap. But
> I didn't find any information about the source (e.g. monticello
> version) version.
>
> I think it would be great to install a release from squeakmap and
> having the opportunity to open monticello and see which newer
> versions (and most important what changes) have been made. The
> squeakmap packages could also add their repository to monticello
> when they are installed.
>
> The only reason against it I can imagine is that this would introduce
> dependencies which aren't wanted.
>
> Norbert
>
> _______________________________________________
> Beginners mailing list
> Beginners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners