|
Re: Re-2: Stef, BotsInc problem...: msg#00183lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners
Actually, Ned's ProcessBrowser does a good job of this right now. Try playing around with it, you will be surprised at how easy it is to pause and restart a background process, inspect it, and interrupt it in a debugger. Note also <http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=1578>, which makes MVC and Morphic work the same way for background processes that update the UI (it also has a small ProcessBrowser fix). Dave On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 12:54:14PM -0800, Todd Blanchard wrote: > I often wish Squeak worked that way by default. > > Too many times I've kicked off a doit that ran for too long, then > began to wonder what it was doing, but the UI was frozen. This is > also true of fileins, etc. I would strongly support an effort to do > much less work in the UI thread and a clean feedback mechanism for > displaying progress and killing/suspending/debugging runaway items. > > > > On Jan 24, 2007, at 7:39 PM, Ned Konz wrote: > > >So the approach that he took was to fork each script and arrange > >for the UI to be updated from time to time as the individual > >scripts are running.
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Translating Morphic/Squeak, Bert Freudenberg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re-2: Stef, BotsInc problem..., Todd Blanchard |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re-2: Stef, BotsInc problem..., Todd Blanchard |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re-2: Stef, BotsInc problem..., Todd Blanchard |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |