logo       

Re: Re-2: Stef, BotsInc problem...: msg#00183

lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners

Subject: Re: Re-2: Stef, BotsInc problem...

Actually, Ned's ProcessBrowser does a good job of this right now.
Try playing around with it, you will be surprised at how easy
it is to pause and restart a background process, inspect it,
and interrupt it in a debugger.

Note also <http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=1578>, which makes
MVC and Morphic work the same way for background processes that
update the UI (it also has a small ProcessBrowser fix).

Dave

On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 12:54:14PM -0800, Todd Blanchard wrote:
> I often wish Squeak worked that way by default.
>
> Too many times I've kicked off a doit that ran for too long, then
> began to wonder what it was doing, but the UI was frozen. This is
> also true of fileins, etc. I would strongly support an effort to do
> much less work in the UI thread and a clean feedback mechanism for
> displaying progress and killing/suspending/debugging runaway items.
>
>
>
> On Jan 24, 2007, at 7:39 PM, Ned Konz wrote:
>
> >So the approach that he took was to fork each script and arrange
> >for the UI to be updated from time to time as the individual
> >scripts are running.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise