|
Re: Image vs. source code (was Re: Very Basic Squeak information): msg#00155lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners
Tyler Sperry wrote: -- but perhaps someone here will point out the Squeakish way of creating "standalone" (in appearance, at least) applications. I hope someone will. I have no burning desire to create a "stand alone" Squeak application, but it would still be interesting to know. This is a great thread, both educational and kind of nostalgic. It reminds me of the shouting match I started on comp.lang.lisp asking how you passed command line arguments to a CLISP program. :) -- Andrew Burton tuglyraisin@xxxxxxx http://utilitarian.us - A Guide to Esoteric Technology in Paragon City http://jarodrussell.livejournal.com/ - Take a guess. ;)
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Send a "global" keystroke from code, Bert Freudenberg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Image vs. source code (was Re: Very Basic Squeak information), Brad Fuller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Image vs. source code (was Re: Very Basic Squeak information), Tyler Sperry |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Image vs. source code (was Re: Very Basic Squeak information), Brad Fuller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |