|
Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?: msg#00156lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners
Milan Zimmermann wrote: > [snip] > I am starting to think (if I read your configuration correctly) - you do have > a different image (I have newer than 7055) and slightly different VM - at > least compiled using different GCC version... The older GCC the faster :) - > If you have time to experiment, you may want to try Ian's VM that I use? > > Thanks for the tip. That definitely made a difference. The benchmark number didn't change by much (dropped to about 13000ms) but responsiveness after the test improved noticeably. David
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Newbies] Why Squeak is so sloooow?, Milan Zimmermann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, Milan Zimmermann |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, Milan Zimmermann |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, Milan Zimmermann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |