|
Re: [Newbies] Why Squeak is so sloooow?: msg#00155lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners
On 2006 September 21 17:06, Brad Fuller wrote: > > Ouch! I just did this (twice, just to make sure) in the 7058 imagine and > > squeak bombed with the output below. > > This was with the latest Linux 3.9 VM. I tried with the 3.7-7 VM and it > > bombed too. > > kernel: 2.6.16-1.2080.16.rrt.rhfc5.ccrma (realtime kernel from Stanford > > - for audio) > > just a note to say that I tried it on kernel: > 2.6.17-1.2174_FC5 > with no difference.... same problem. > Anyone have an idea for this? not really .. just FWIW it is ok with: ======================== Squeak3.9g-7058.image mzimmermann@home-server:~> squeak -version 3.9-7 #5 Mon Apr 24 20:07:28 PDT 2006 gcc 3.3.5 Squeak3.9alpha of 4 July 2005 [latest update: #7021] Linux vps.piumarta.com 2.4.20-021stab028.18.777-enterprise #1 SMP Wed Sep 14 19:34:46 MSD 2005 i686 GNU/Linux default plugin location: /usr/local/lib/squeak/3.9-7/*.so ======================== (SuSE 9.3) Milan > > _______________________________________________ > Beginners mailing list > Beginners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, David Shaffer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, David Shaffer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, cummij |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Newbies] Why Squeak is so sloooow?, Brad Fuller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |