|
Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?: msg#00153lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners
stephane ducasse wrote: > Hi david > this is really strange because 3.9 is much snappier than 3.8 on our > machines. This is strange. > Do you use a special settings (such as some strange smallland setup?) > > Stef > Nope, fresh 3.9g-7055 image. I develop in 3.7 which is fairly snappy. 3.9 seems a tad slower. Most notable is the pause when I select a method in the browser. This might have to do with the syntax highlighting. Anyway it took me a while to get used to 3.7...3.9 might be the same way. I plan to play with it more now that Milan got me interested in MathMorphs. So much cool stuff lurking around in Squeak! David
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, cummij |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, David Shaffer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, stephane ducasse |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, Milan Zimmermann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |