|
Re: [Newbies] Why Squeak is so sloooow?: msg#00147lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners
Brad Fuller wrote: > Yoshiki Ohshima wrote: > >> Antonio, >> >> If you evaluate the following (and print-it): >> >> | a b | >> a := FloatArray new: (16 * 1024*1024). >> b := FloatArray new: (16 * 1024*1024). >> [a += b] timeToRun. >> >> you probably get a number around 100 or 200. This means that Squeak >> can add two 32-bit float arrays with 16M entries in 100 milliseconds >> or such. This is basicaly comparable Java-performance. >> > Ouch! I just did this (twice, just to make sure) in the 7058 imagine and > squeak bombed with the output below. > This was with the latest Linux 3.9 VM. I tried with the 3.7-7 VM and it > bombed too. > kernel: 2.6.16-1.2080.16.rrt.rhfc5.ccrma (realtime kernel from Stanford > - for audio) > just a note to say that I tried it on kernel: 2.6.17-1.2174_FC5 with no difference.... same problem. Anyone have an idea for this?
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, Milan Zimmermann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, David Shaffer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Newbies] Why Squeak is so sloooow?, Brad Fuller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, cummij |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |