Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?

On 2006 September 21 15:07, David Shaffer wrote:
>
> There is no XYPlotter in my 3.9g-7055 image. 

> Milan Zimmermann wrote:
<<snip>>
> I do not know how to run any "oficial" graphical tests, but with 
> MathMorphRevival installed ( plug :):) ) 

You would have to install the above package from Squeakmap to run the 
"graphics test" I mentioned, but please note it's alpha, so install to a 3.9 
image without important stuff.

I am not sure this is a good "graphical test", it does create graphs, so it 
should have some value, it is non-interactive graphics though. Apart from 
that, 3.9 feels as good as 3.7 here, but as you said .. it's my feelin' only

Milan

> I tried loading Plot Morph 
> and Plot Morph 2 from SqueakMap.  Neither worked so I'm guessing that's
> not the source of this class for 3.9.  I'd be happy to run this
> benchmark on the off chance it will lead to some information about why
> things are sluggish.  I'm guessing, though, that it is a dead-end.
> "feels slow" is often hard to track down in benchmarks.  Probably
> something that does window manipulation would reveal the problem...
>
> David
>
> _______________________________________________
> Beginners mailing list
> Beginners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners