Re: Why Squeak is so sloooow?

  Antonio,

  If you evaluate the following (and print-it):

  | a b |
  a := FloatArray new: (16 * 1024*1024).
  b := FloatArray new: (16 * 1024*1024).
  [a += b] timeToRun.

you probably get a number around 100 or 200.  This means that Squeak
can add two 32-bit float arrays with 16M entries in 100 milliseconds
or such.  This is basicaly comparable Java-performance.

  Yes, some areas in Squeak is slow, but there are a few ways to make
particular stuff faster.

-- Yoshiki


At Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:18:48 +0200 (CEST),
Antonio San. wrote:
> 
> I don't know if occurs the same in windows, but in
> linux squeak is very slow. 
> I mean that all the thinks related to move pixels over
> the screen causes cpu overheat in a desmesurated way
> and a big latency. 
> It is specially bad for videogames developed in squeak
> because the movement of a picture imply a speed down
> of other pictures in the game.
> 
> I thought that it was caused by my old PC. But I have
> tested in five diferents machines, included a powerful
> P4 with 2.8Ghz and 512 Mb RAM, with the same results.
> 
> Is X system (xfree86 and xorg) a bad way for execute
> squeak? Occur the same in windows?
> 
> 
> 
>       
>       
>               
> ______________________________________________ 
> LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. 
> Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. 
> http://es.voice.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Beginners mailing list
> Beginners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners