|
Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?: msg#00135lang.smalltalk.squeak.beginners
Brad Fuller wrote: > Maybe you should do some proper scientific tests on your specific needs. > What type of game are you going to create? > > You're certainly right Brad but let me add that the Squeak 3.9 image is unbearably slow on my linux-based laptop (2Ghz Pentium 4M, 1Gb RAM). I've even tried VM's from 3.8 to Ian's recent 3.9 release. It is too slow for simple window operations and causes a gastly amount of CPU utilization even under lite GUI use. Antonio might be reflecting on this same perception of slowness and frankly I'm sure that any amount of "proper scientific testing" is going to reveal that it feels like walking though mud ;-) Anyway I'm still using a 3.7 image for development. Nice and snappy. David
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, Brad Fuller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, Brad Fuller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, Brad Fuller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RE: Why Squeak is so sloooow?, Brad Fuller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |