|
Re: Brace style bias?: msg#00527lang.scala
Miles Sabin wrote: > > I've just been bitten by an interaction between Scala's newline rules > and my prefered brace style (BSD/Allman style[1] > ... > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indent_style > Given a choice, I also use the BSD/Allman style. Here's a concrete proposal that I believe would make the compiler brace-placement-neutral. Add "and is not a '{'" to the Scala Language Specification section 1.2, to give:- A newline in a Scala source text is treated as the special NewLine token if the three following criteria are satisfied: 1. The token immediately preceding the newline can terminate a statement. 2. The token immediately following the newline can begin a statement and is not a '{'. 3. The token appears in a region where multiple statements are allowed. Add the following example to a tutorial or an FAQ:- When using braces for scoping, a ';' is needed to terminate the preceding statement:- class C { { val x = 1 f(x) } def f(n: Int) = Console.println(n) val x = 2 f(x); { val x = 3 f(x) }; { val x = 4 f(x) } } -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Brace-style-bias--tf3129013.html#a8728125 Sent from the Scala mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | "What non-Java language are you most interested in running on the JVM?" poll: 00527, Tomi Maila |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | filterMap, for comprehensions and collection-oriented functions: 00527, Judson, Ross |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Brace style bias?i: 00527, Raphael Cohn |
| Next by Thread: | Tail recursion elimination and logical shortcut operators: 00527, Miles Sabin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |