Re: implicit defs (Poor Man's Type Classes)

Imam,

You might also want to check out Martin's talk on Poor Man's Type  
Classes (http://lampwww.epfl.ch/~odersky/talks/wg2.8-boston06.pdf)
  -- if you haven't already (it discusses how traits correspond to  
type classes and implicit definitions to type class instances, just  
like you guessed ;-)
IIRC, it doesn't mention <% as corresponding to type class contexts,  
which nonetheless I think is true.)

adriaan

Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm