|
Re: sbaz compiler packages doubts: msg#00088lang.scala
The "2" suffixes were used during the beta. We plan to make Scala 2 the official Scala soon, so we are renaming everything back to simply scala.bat, scala-library.jar, and so on. The classpath chosen by scala.bat does not seem good for reasons other than the one you mention: it does not properly handle classpath's that override stuff from the bazaar, e.g. if you are developing a new version of a package that has been previously published. I also agree that "." should be included in the normal class path, so long as there is some way to turn off > Is the sources library needed for compiling on scala2 like sources > were needed for scala1 ? I don't believe so. [ SCALA_HOME versus _SCALA_HOME ] Yes, there's a mismatch there, thanks! -Lex |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: against the components utopia: 00088, Judson, Ross |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Interactive interpreter in Scala 2?: 00088, Lex Spoon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: sbaz compiler packages doubtsi: 00088, Gabriel Riba |
| Next by Thread: | Scala plugin in Eclipse 3.2M5: 00088, Andrei Formiga |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |