Re: Feature request: Alternative extension for .rhtml files

On 9/29/06, Hendy Irawan <gauldong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If possible, maybe just make .rhtml the preferred extension, but if it
> fails (template not found), check for a template with the same name
> but different extension, possibly .ruby.html, .rails.html, .r.html,
> .erb.html, or whatever but just end it with html. So everybody will be
> happy, especially me. Thanks...

I kinda like .r.html...then editors that recognize .html will all work
fine, and smarter editors can see .r.html and do more.

But I don't do any Rails work :)

-- 
Contribute to RubySpec! @ www.headius.com/rubyspec
Charles Oliver Nutter @ headius.blogspot.com
Ruby User @ ruby.mn

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---