Re: resource_feeder feedback

I agree that we should promote Atom over RSS. If you're going to make a
new feed, you might as well make it RSS. Of course, you should be able
to overwrite this to still output RSS. With RSS, we might as well be
opinionated there too and just say RSS 2.0.

Regarding rfeed, I think it's a nice solution for involved feeds. But I
definitely think we should strive to make it a no-option call to
generate a feed for a class that looks as we expect.

In the specifics, it all looks like good suggestions. I'm waiting to
svn up and see them all implemented ;)

Thanks for taking the time to be so meticulous, Sam.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---