|
Re: [BUG?] Rails installation -- first in a series: msg#00183lang.ruby.rails.core
> Thanks Mr. Kemper... > > Anyways, it'd be greater if we can have a tarball of all needed gems > instead of a "rails working directory". I think it'd be more useful. If > it's already there somewhere it'd be great if it can be listed in the > rubyonrails download page. Isn't this what instant rails or locomotive try to solve? One download which includes everything you need to get up and running with rails? -- Cheers Koz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: bug in routes ???, Greg Hauptmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ActiveSupport::Multibyte for better Unicode support, Michael Koziarski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [BUG?] Rails installation -- first in a series, Ceefour |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [BUG?] Rails installation -- first in a series, Luke Redpath |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |