|
Re: Data_Make_Struct Considered Dangerous?: msg#01226lang.ruby.general
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 02:10:22AM +0900, William Djaja Tjokroaminata wrote: > Using the Ruby-C way, currently my simulation can run for more then 3 days > with stable memory. Whatever people say about one way or another, I stand > by my numbers. Currently the objective is to achieve close to 1 > million events/sec. So far the bottlenecks are the Ruby gc, the mark > functions, and memory allocation/deallocation. So one objective in > the software architecture will be to be able to run the code with > GC.disable. Perhaps Ruby is not the tool you should be using. This sounds like a classic case of putting a square peg into a round hole. Paul
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Perl calling C calling Ruby (linking problem), Peter Munro |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: win32ole and excel, MikkelFJ |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Data_Make_Struct Considered Dangerous?, William Djaja Tjokroaminata |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Data_Make_Struct Considered Dangerous?, William Djaja Tjokroaminata |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |