|
Re: Unicode in Ruby now?: msg#01199lang.ruby.general
>Which leads to some interesting Orwellian possibilities: not just >could people removed from history, but we arrange the character set so >that their name cannot even be expressed. But communication has a way of flowing around such stumbling blocks; this mail, in fact, purports to hail from a fictitious world in which all fonts omit a particular famous non-consonant. Notwithstanding this handicap, I find I can still transmit my thoughts smoothly (although as with UTF-8, it's kind of long and awkward). Bnjamin Ptrson x
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Sibling rivalry and class variables, dblack |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OT] Programming practice question, Chris Ross |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Unicode in Ruby now?, Dave Thomas |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Syntax proposal, Patrick May |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |