Re: class === class often false?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <dblack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: class === class often false?


> It's actually y.is_a? x

Oh, yes.
 
> which I think is to help with case statement syntax:

Yes.

> > Note also that if a class includes a module, it
> > then has the "is a" relationship with that module,
> > and an included module shows up in the list of
> > ancestors. (Since a module is a kind of parent --
> > it's like a limited form of inheritance.)
> 
> It is among the ancestors, but there's no is_a? or === relationship:

(snip where you prove this)
 
Hmm, brain fade on my part. Happens daily.
 
> However, Array objects do return true on these tests:
> 
>   irb(main):026:0> [].is_a? Enumerable
>   true
>   irb(main):027:0> Enumerable === []
>   true

That must be what I was thinking.

> A (whimsical) further test:
> 
>   irb(main):036:0> class Class; include Enumerable; end
>   Class
>   irb(main):037:0> Enumerable === Array
>   true
> 
> So ancestors/is_a?/Module#=== are related but can vary independently.

Yes, this is where my brain itches again.

> Now, this one:
> 
>   irb(main):015:0> Kernel === Object
>   true
> 
> is a little puzzling to me, because I would have thought Object:Kernel
> was the same relationship as Array:Enumerable.  Except... there is
> that circularity/singularity at the top of the chain -- which I
> alternate between thinking I understand and losing sleep over :-)  In
> this case I can't say I entirely understand exactly how/why it would
> account for the result, but I think somehow it does.

Probably true.

I'll think about this more later.

Hal