|
Re: Release time! (Was: Release time?): msg#00067lang.ruby.gems.devel
> On 12/21/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain-48TerJ1FxhPk1uMJSBkQmQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> I think that means its time to push a beta... Can I do that myself, >> or do I need Jim or Chad to do it? >> > > Jim has historically done the beta releases of RubyGems on his own > server, which doesn't appear to be responding right now. He has a job > from which he can't use the internet all day, so I propose we wait > until he gets home and has a chance to respond and then if it will be > a pain to deploy to the usual place, we do something different. I > would prefer to leave the betas outside of the main rubygems repo, but > we could always throw them somewhere else temporariy if need be. Good news! My box is back up, so putting the beta gem in the normal place won't be a problem. Eric, if you wish to create the beta, that is not a problem. The biggest issue with betas is to make sure the 4 digit version number is properly incremented between different betas. Make sure the change log is up to date ... we don't need it for the beta, but I use that to glean diffs from previous versions for the release notes on a full release. Thanks for all your hard work. -- Jim Weirich
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | [rubygems] Build still broken (#1157), Cerberus |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [rubygems] Build still broken (#1149), Eric Hodel |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Release time! (Was: Release time?), Chad Fowler |
| Next by Thread: | [rubygems] Build still broken (#1157), Cerberus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |