|
Re: Release time! (Was: Release time?): msg#00065lang.ruby.gems.devel
On 12/21/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain-48TerJ1FxhPk1uMJSBkQmQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Dec 20, 2006, at 02:17, Eric Hodel wrote: > > > There's one open bug that should be easy to fix. > > > > There's one feature request that could be fixed in a reasonable > > amount of time. (The other two involve tattle). > > > > I think that means its time to release. > > There are zero bugs open. > > There are zero feature requests open. > > The two Cerberus test failures appear to be platform-specific and > test-specific. > > I think that means its time to push a beta... Can I do that myself, > or do I need Jim or Chad to do it? > Jim has historically done the beta releases of RubyGems on his own server, which doesn't appear to be responding right now. He has a job from which he can't use the internet all day, so I propose we wait until he gets home and has a chance to respond and then if it will be a pain to deploy to the usual place, we do something different. I would prefer to leave the betas outside of the main rubygems repo, but we could always throw them somewhere else temporariy if need be. Chad
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [rubygems] Build still broken (#1149), Anatol Pomozov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [rubygems] Build still broken (#1157), Cerberus |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Release time! (Was: Release time?), Eric Hodel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Release time! (Was: Release time?), jim-Fxty1mrVU9GlFc2d6oM/ew |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |