Re: New patch for 'gem contents' bug

On Dec 9, 2006, at 12:01 AM, Tom Pollard wrote:
> 2) the '--version' option didn't work at all, because the version
>    number you specified was treated as a gem name,

I notice now that this was already reported by Scott Sayles (with a  
patch) more than a year ago as bug #2723.

https://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php? 
func=detail&aid=2723&group_id=126&atid=575

TomP