On Aug 25, 2006, at 22:29, Mat Schaffer wrote:
Guess coloring the stdlib docs might not be a great idea then. What
about some sort of easy configuration? So the users that liked it
could get it but not all users were forced. If we can't count on
server-side scripts, seems like javascript cookies would do.
Server-side scripts? Cookies? Are we talking about syntax-color-coding
a user's locally generated HTML-based (or maybe ri-based with terminal
ANSI codes) RDoc-generated documentation, or color-coding the
documentation hosted at ruby-doc.org?
The former would (should?) be a matter of picking a non-default
template when generating the documentation. The latter...well, although
I'm definitely pro-color-coding, I don't think it's a good idea for the
ruby-doc archives. Colored source that uses a different scheme than
the one I'm used to can be worse than none at all.
|
