Download Firefox: WindowsMac OS X
logo       
Google Custom Search
    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Re: 2nd try at date/format.rb & pty.c: msg#00008

Subject: Re: 2nd try at date/format.rb & pty.c
On Aug 18, 2006, at 8:25 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Mat Schaffer wrote:
I have two patches. The first is another try at the documentation for date/format.rb. Hopefully it's acceptable this time. The other is for pty.c. I checked both of them with stdlib-doc and they work fine. But the link on the left frame for pty still links to shl.rb. I'm not sure how to make it point to the PTY class docs.

Anyway, let me know what you think.

These patches appear to be against ruby_1_8. Please send patches against HEAD. If backporting to ruby_1_8 is non-trivial, please supply a separate patch for ruby_1_8. I can handle trivial backporting.
I'll check out HEAD, find out and let you know.

Documentation must be wrapped to 80 characters.

Please send unified diffs.
What do I use to create unified diffs? These were from eclipse but identical to the output of 'cvs diff'.

pty_doc.diff:

>  * PTY.getpty("command") do |output, input, pid|
> * # At this point output and input are the command's output and input stream, respectively. pid is the command's process ID.
>  * end

This should be indented to turn it into a code block.
How far should it be indented and does HTML <code> qualify as a code block?

Those aren't just documentation changes.
Good catch there. Must have gotten something screwed up since there was an update between my first and second try and I tried to merge them appropriately. I'll do it again on HEAD and hopefully it'll come out right.





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>