Re: New Arrival, and no link to some ruby-doc archives?

Dave Howell wrote:
> On Jul 24, 2006, at 15:35, James Britt wrote:
>
> > I did not think all that much about it; the list traffic had become 
> > fairly mundane, and (for me at least) an archive , while nice, seemed 
> > extraneous.
> Well, I tend to think of the archive as more useful to people who 
> *aren't* subscribed, or weren't. :)
True.  I guess after a while it just seems mundane.  Still, it's nice to 
be able to go back and look stuff up.
> But my query wasn't so much "why isn't there an archive," but "Is the 
> lack of a link to an archive from the web site intentional?"
Sort of.   When the site got revamped, I dropped the reference to the 
archive because it was non-existent.    Had I thought a bit more, I 
would have added a link to a working alternative.
I've now added a link to Gmane.


James