Hugh Sasse wrote:
That's *after* he's managed it. We haven't got a "pending"
repository, then? I'm thinking of somewhere he could check as and
when he has time to do so, rather than being pestered :-)...
Is this actually needed? So far, people would write docs, post them
here or on ruby-core, get the attention of the lib owner or some other
responsible party, and (assuming the docs were OK) they go into CVS.
If the proposed docs are not correct, then some E-mail exchange would occur.
Has that not been working well enough that yet another level of
indirection (a stop-over in some repository) is needed?
If you can't get the attention of someone to review and commit the docs,
will having them in a repository help?
James
|
