On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, James Britt wrote:
Alexander Kellett wrote:
i see this frequently with many projects
can ruby-doc house a maintained repo for
such modifications to make sure they get in
to the relevant repo's?
What's a repo?
Repository? [Glad I'm not the only one unsure about that! :-)]
[...]
Yes, the question is what's the best way to avoid duplication.
And it is about communication as well. Between code writers and
documentors, between people documenting the same code, and between
new users and documentors to reduce complaints about no
Western-langauge docs.
[...]
If changes are made to the core code, I can then grab the current 1.8 source
and rebuild the docs*. Changes made to the standard lib should be reflected
in the uploads managed by Gavin Sinclair.
Which is to where?
James Britt
* Clearly a job for ruby + cron
Rake, for that matter.
Hugh
| 
