Re: Could Ruby-doc be better? -- Proposal for a be: msg#00009

Download Firefox: Windows, Mac OS X

Re: Could Ruby-doc be better? -- Proposal for a better system.: msg#00009

Subject:	Re: Could Ruby-doc be better? -- Proposal for a better system.

On 6/7/05, Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think we should also go away from the idea to generate HTML files.

Umm, performance issues?

-- 
Premshree Pillai
http://www.livejournal.com/users/premshree/

Special educational offers, white papers, webcasts, podcasts

WEBCAST: Register for “The Business Benefits of Enterprise Mashups” (Case Study)

WEBCAST: How to deploy and use WebSphere and VMware together” (Case Study)

WHITE PAPER: Writing Good Software Systems Development Use Cases. (Best Practices)

WHITE PAPER: Best practices for software analysis (Best Practices)

DOWNLOAD: Regis ter for Rational Trial Software Download – Rational Team Concert Free Information

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:	Re: Could Ruby-doc be better? -- Proposal for a better system., Lothar Scholz
Next by Date:	Re: Could Ruby-doc be better? -- Proposal for a better system., Hugh Sasse
Previous by Thread:	Re: Could Ruby-doc be better? -- Proposal for a better system., Hugh Sasse
Next by Thread:	Hello, everyone, mathew
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

^^^ ADDITIONAL NAVIGATION ^^^

Recently Viewed:
emacs.dvc.devel... java.displaytag... ietf.rfc822/199... linux.altlinux.... redhat.fedora.r... python.ctypes/2... video.panorama/... freedesktop.xor... audio.emagic.lo... netbsd.devel.us... documentation.t... yellowdog.gener... gnome.mono.mono... bacula.user/200... shells.bash.bug... xfree86.devel/2... culture.bicycle... mozilla.devel.n... web.squid.gener... user-groups.gul... kde.amarok.bugs... org.user-groups... handhelds.linux... tex.context/200...

Home | blog view, Court Document Archive | USPTO Patent Archive (NEW!) | advertise | OSDir is an inevitable website. super tiny logo