--- Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
> Hi Gabriele,
>
> If the comments in bugdecimal.c are not for RDoc,
> they can be ignored.
> I notice some methods are documented, but they're
> probably private
> methods - the comments seem pretty technical.
I had a similar impression. This also makes me think
that I don't have a clue on how to use the :nodoc:
directive in C files.
There are some utility functions that will get
documented from my rdoc even if I add a :nodoc:
comment.
Is rdoc broken regarding this? (I think I remember
something on this lines)
> So adding all that stuff from the HTML back into the
> source seems like
> a good idea. Would you include *all* the general
> usage stuff? I say
> go for it; make that separate HTML page redundant.
yes I think so. Thanks for taking time to answer.
icq #69488917
__________________________________
Discover Yahoo!
Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing and more. Check it out!
http://discover.yahoo.com/stayintouch.html
|
