On Thursday, March 10, 2005, 4:50:21 AM, Hugh wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, James Britt wrote:
>> Austin Ziegler wrote:
>>> That is, if you run the ri documentation on Diff::LCS, because
>>> Diff::LCS offers the ability to extend Array, it modifies the
>>> documentation for Array in ri.
>>
>> Right, and this is another example of ri being broken. It was not meant to
>> manage anything other than the core libs. The first version assumed
>> hand-crafted content. The next (current) version was able to feed off of of
>> rdoc, but still has no way to deal intelligently with confilcits with the
>> core lib files. I;'ve run rdoc/ri on the std lib, and t just hses things.
>> This is wrong.
> Is anyone still working on rj?
> http://rjay.rubyforge.org/
> It was intended to be ri.succ, hence the name. It doesn't seem to have
> been touched for a year...
No, I didn't see a need for it after 2-gen RI. Still don't :)
Gavin
|
