Quoting jbritt@xxxxxxxxxxxx, on Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 08:28:54AM -0700:
> >There could even be a diff afterwords, and if the docs are actually
> >different push a notice out on an RSS feed, but thats probably asking
> >too much of volunteers. :-)
>
> There is an RSS feed of the Ruby CVS, and perhaps if people use some
> predictable commenting then those specific items concerning doc patches
> can be republished.
There's a great quote from an Alaskan mountaineering site:
don't plan on being lucky
Don't plan on people's cvs log messages becoming predictable!
My SRV record patch for resolv.rb, for example, wasn't a doc patch, it
added a new record. It doesn't say in the cvs log that I put rdoc
comments on top, but I did, making them the only rdoc comments in all of
resolv.rb.
And the #sleep patch was just bundled in with a huge commit.
Cheers,
Sam
|
