On Mar 8, 2005, at 2:05 PM, Austin Ziegler wrote:
I would agree with you in general, but the immediate comparison will
be to perldoc, which contains a lot of this information. I think that
certain objects (e.g., ARGV, a few others) should be included. I would
draw the line at keywords... maybe. It might be nice to find out the
semantics of the "for" loop at the command-line from time to time.
agreed, but globals and constants (which ARGV fits into) should imo
be documented. or is it implementation problems that stops this?
Alex
|
