Re: [OT] ruby-talk subscriber-only? (Re: [TEST] Please ignore)

Gavin Sinclair wrote:

> On Saturday, February 14, 2004, 3:51:19 PM, Austin wrote:
 >>I think that it's something that was done after the last clr gateway 
bustup.
That's what I figured, but I don't recall seeing any formal announcement 
(but then lately I've only been able to scan the list for the few items 
I have time to pay attention to).
> Which is strange, given that "anyone can post" was a matter of
> principle (that I don't share) than practicality.  Oh well.
Same here.  I sort of prefer the "members only" approach, but I've now 
discovered that the address I use to receive ruby-talk is apparently not 
a subscriber or something. Odd.
I'm going to see if I can get a conformation on this from the list 
admin, and perhaps put a post on ruby-lang.org if in fact this is a 
change from earlier behavior.
James

> Gavin